The Trafigura litigation continues: Dutch court accepts jurisdiction but...
I have in the past reported fleetingly about the Trafigura litigation, in which the company is and has been pursued in various jurisdictions for the environmental and public health damage resulting...
View ArticleAssymetrical jurisdiction clauses. Their existence and (obiter) their...
Apologies for late posting. I had tweeted and linked and done all sorts of other things when the judgment came out but as readers tell me, that is not quite the same as a review on this blog. Walker J...
View ArticleGolden Endurance: Submission to jurisdiction as a matter of mixed law and fact.
Golden Endurance v RMA, [2016] EWHC 2110 (Comm), illustrates the attraction of having a unified approach to submission (to jurisdiction), otherwise known as voluntary appearance. In current case, the...
View ArticleConflicts, conflicts Uber-al. Employment and conflict of laws (Rome I) in the...
Thank you Steve Peers for alerting me to the relevance of the conflict of laws and the Rome I Regulation in particular in the recent Aslam et al v Uber Employment Tribunal decision. The case...
View ArticlePlace of performance of a contract: Court of Appeal in JEB v Binstock.
In JEB Recoveries v Binstock, [2016] EWCA Civ 1008, the Court of Appeal (on appeal from the High Court, 2015] EWHC 1063 (Ch)) exhaustively reviewed relevant EU precedent for the determination of the...
View ArticleSiemens: Debt arising from the unjustified repayment (by the authorities) of...
The Court held in C-102/15 Siemens just before mine and their summer break. It had escaped my attention. At issue was whether debt arising from the unjustified repayment of a fine for infringement of...
View ArticleNow here’s a nice thought.
Our children often hug me goodnight while I am working away at a brief or sitting next to a huge pile of exam papers, waiting to be marked. And especially in the latter case, I confess this is often...
View ArticleA little pousse-cafe. Gaz de France v STS: annulment of arbitral award on...
Something to digest quietly, to start this new year: in Gaz de France v STS the French Conseil d’Etat annuled an arbitral award for breach of ordre public. The Conseil objected in particular to the...
View ArticleCybercrime and jurisdiction. The CJEU in Concurrences /Samsung /Amazon.
In the flurry of judgments issued by the European Court of Justice on Super Wednesday, 21 December, spare a read for C-618/15 Concurrence /Samsumg /Amazon: Cybercrime, which dealt with jurisdiction for...
View ArticleIt does not get more The Hague than this. Footballing around jurisdiction,...
Thank you Bob Wessels for alerting me to ADO Den Haag v United Vansen (of China). ADO Den Haag NV (the corporate vehicle of a Dutch Premier League club) domiciled at The Hague, sue United Vansen...
View ArticleHooley: Modified universalism outside the EU’s Insolvency Regulation.
Hooley [Hooley v The Victoria Jute Company Ltd and others [2016] CSOH 14] has been sitting in my in-box for a few months. It concerns the liquidation (particularly: selling of companies’ assets by...
View ArticleCitysprint: Speeding away from legalese. Employment tribunals act against...
The issue under consideration in Citysprint was whether claimant, Ms Dewhurst, a cycle courier, was an employee of Citysprint or rather, as defendant would have it, a self-employed contractor. I am not...
View ArticleFinding SHELLter. The High Court on CSR and applicable law in Okpabi.
Where does one look first? : as I reported last week, Ms Kiobel is now taking her US case to The Netherlands (this case essentially involves human rights), at a time when Shell is still pursued in the...
View ArticleNow you sue me, now you don’t. Trump v Daily Mail.
The president and Mrs Trump keep on exercising the courts. In Melania Trump v Webster Tarpley and Mail Media, Inc., the circuit court for Montgomery County, Maryland, accepted jurisdiction against the...
View ArticleLodi Trading, a lotta fog: Kolassa in the Belgian Supreme Court.
Many thanks Michael Verhaeghe (whom I have the pleasure with jointly to be representing a client) for alerting me to Lodi Trading in which the Belgian Supreme Court applied (and distinguished)...
View ArticleVinyls Italia: Szpunar AG on the chemistry between the Insolvency Regulation...
In C-54/16 Vinyls Italia (in full: Vinyls Italia SpA, in liquidation v Mediterranea di Navigazione SpA) Szpunar AG opined last week (the Opinion is not available in English). At the core of the case is...
View ArticleCJEU in Zulfikarpašić: Suggest generic criteria for ‘courts’; completes the...
The Court held yesterday in Zulfikarpašić Case C-484/15. I review Bot AG ‘s Opinion here. At issue is the interpretation of ‘court’ and ‘judgment’ in the European enforcement order Regulation....
View ArticleOn ‘civil and commercial’, and, again, notaries as courts. The CJEU in Pula...
Issued on the same day as Zulfikarpašić, Pula Parking Case C-551/15 deals with similar core issues, with a few extras thrown in. Pula Parking, a company owned by the town of Pula (Croatia), carries...
View ArticleSinocore International Co Ltd v RBRG Trading: The commercial court on fraus,...
Fraus omnia corrumpit (fraud corrupts all; alternatively formulated as ex turpi causa non oritur actio) is not easily applied in conflict of laws. See an earlier post here. In Sinocore International...
View ArticleMicrosoft (Nokia) v Sony. This battery keeps on going: relatively of...
The one sorry outcome of [2017] EWHC 374 (Ch) Microsoft (Nokia) v Sony is that by rejecting jurisdiction, the Commercial Court did not have an opportunity to review the application of Rome II’s...
View Article